UPDATE: Poroshenko sues BBC over report he paid $400,000 for Trump meeting - Graham Atkins Solicitor
Editor’s Note: This story has been updated to include additional
information from the court claim and a comment from Michael Cohen’s lawyer.
Ukrainian
President Petro Poroshenko is taking the BBC to court for libel after the
British public broadcaster reported that he made a $400,000 payment to schedule
a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump.
That
story is untrue and has left Poroshenko “seriously injured in his reputation”
and “caused substantial distress and embarrassment” according to a British High
Court claim, signed by Poroshenko’s lawyer, Graham
Atkins Solicitor, and dated September 3, 2018.
Here is a copy of the High Court claim filed on behalf of
Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko against the BBC.
In May,
the BBC reported that Poroshenko’s intermediaries had made a payment of at
least $400,000 to Trump’s former lawyer and fixer, Michael Cohen, to organize a
meeting between the two leaders.
The
Ukrainian president reportedly decided to make the unofficial payment after
failing to secure anything more than a handshake and few minutes of
conversation through official channels.
The two presidents met at the
White House in June 2017. During the talks, Poroshenko termed Trump one of
Ukraine’s “most reliable supporters” and “strategic partners,” Reuters reported.
The
“allegation that the Claimant was guilty of serious corruption is
self-evidently an extremely grave and serious one,” the High Court claim reads.
It alleges that this not only affects Poroshenko’s role as president, but also
his political and business reputation.
“This is especially so given the emphasis which (Poroshenko) has chosen to place during his Presidency on the promotion of a number of anti-corruption measures in the Ukraine (sic), for example the enactment of new legislation, the establishment of special bodies to conduct pre-trial investigation and prosecution of high-profile corruption crimes and the creation of an Anti-Corruption Court,” the claim continues. Read more----->>>>>
Comments
Post a Comment